Sennheiser MKH 8050 / MKH 50 – supercardioid indoor microphone

Sennheiser MKH 8050 is a supercardioid microphone, an industry standard for miking dialogues indoors as well as spot miking. It has natural, well-rounded sound, distinctively rich and warm in character. It offers significantly more side rejection than a cardioid but less than an interference tube shotgun. Unlike shotgun however, MKH 8050 has very little off-axis coloration, sounds more natural and less susceptible to comb filtering, which is a common problem when interference tube mics are used indoors. Other than that, it boasts very low self-noise and virtually zero distortion, although being quite susceptible to vibrations, it also begs for an upgraded shock-mount.

Sound & quality

Sennheiser MKH 8050 sounds incredibly rich and warm in character. The highs are also there with just a touch of brightness to retain clarity but the lows are certainly overwhelming. I’m usually not the biggest fan of the sound too rich, dark and warm because the mics producing the sound matching this description always turn up artificially inflated in one or the other part of the low-end specter, ending up being also muddy, puffy or boomy up to a degree. Yet, this doesn’t seem to be the case with the MKH 8050, a supercardioid very linear in its response from lows to highs, and this applies to not only direct response but off-axis response too!

When more brightness is required, it is easy to bring the lows down a bit post recording – it responds very well to EQ, so this certainly isn’t an issue. This mic also has a great reach, not in terms of directionality because that’s what the shotguns are for, but in terms of sounding natural and as rich as ever even at a considerable distance like half a meter, when other mics would usually thin out quite a bit and lose their consistency. This is especially crucial for instruments, which is why; it’s perfectly suitable for musical application too. Not only does it have an incredible tonal accuracy that is independent of axis but it also retains its low-end richness with distance.

Application

MKH50-squareSennheiser MKH 8050 is of course best suited for indoors, first of all renowned as the mic for dialogues. Supercardioid pattern gives it just about enough side rejection to focus on 2-3 people while reducing the room noise to a good degree. With evenly spaced placement, about half a meter above, talents sound pretty natural, rich and equivalent in volume, which is the recipe for a good recording. Unlike the MKH 416 however, it should not be used for voice-overs because it is a poor choice for close miking and doesn’t provide any benefits. With windshield, it can also work pretty well outside yet it cannot compete with shotguns.

There are couple of reasons as to why this is so, first being the inferior side-rejection, which is by design. The other is it is more difficult to handle it, because it’s much more sensitive to vibrations. The mic’s richness has its drawback that it also amplifies handling noises to a great degree, which occur at the bottom of its low-end response. This can be especially heard in a quiet setting when on a boom, and it may be difficult for an operator not to make any noises. There are of course solutions to this other than switching back to a shotgun; one could use a stationary mount or to procure themselves a high-end shock mount, which is what I would advise.

Overall

MKH50-square

The mic may have some drawbacks, which mostly come down to the problems with the user rather than the mic itself, but I don’t feel like exaggerating those details, as it still excels at what it does, and I don’t know any other mic that would come on top in terms of sound quality. MKH50 in comparison being an older version might be a little more susceptible to EMI especially compared to the MKH416 with a longer tube, but the overall specs are slightly in favor of the MKH50. However, I haven’t noticed a lot of difference so would probably grab the one that goes on sale first. But in ideal settings, and if form factor isn’t an issue one might consider a marginal difference in purity in favor of the MKH 50P48.

Overall, Sennheiser MKH 8050 is a perfect addition to your gear that will complement for a quality shotgun when working indoors and wanting to achieve the best sound possible. Shotguns like 416 could also accomplish this job rather well but there is a variety of reasons for switching to the supercardioid MKH 8050 . Once again, you may want to minimize the comb-filtering effect that affects shotguns when shooting in the interiors, minimize off-axis coloration when miking multiple persons, or simply want the most natural and tonally accurate sound that retains its richness with a little bit of extra reach added to it.

- Reviewed at $1,200

Pros

  • Amazing sound quality & tonal accuracy
  • Frequency-independent directional characteristics
  • Rich low end and linear response
  • Good reach for miking multiple talents
  • Very clean audio, low self-noise
  • RF-biased, works in high humidity

Cons

  • The older version might be slightly more susceptible to EMI and doesn’t offer any significant improvement in vibration mitigation, but I’m just being nitpicky here, as I’m yet to find anything better.

Best Price on Sennheiser MKH 8050
---

Best Price on Sennheiser MKH 50P48 (Older Model)
---

Review score
  • Excellent! - 9.6/10
    9.6/10

COMMENTS

  • Peter

    While I absolutely swear by this mic, both the new and the old versions seem out of reach for most people’s budgets. If you’re looking for an indoor alternative, consider the Audix SCX1-HC review — it delivers excellent performance at a much more affordable price.

  • Johnny

    I’m looking for a high-quality supercardioid mic. Could you clarify the difference between the two?

  • Peter

    Well, it’s mainly the form factor—the 8050 is much smaller, and being a newer version, I would expect somewhat higher reliability. Mkh 50 has slightly superior specs but feels more like a compact shotgun. If you mainly use it for booming just get the MKH 50, otherwise you may consider 8050 with its tiny footprint. Both options are fine.

Leave a Reply to Johnny Cancel reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>