RØDE NTG3 Review: Professional short shotgun

Rode NTG3 is a well-priced professional shotgun that boasts stellar sound quality and low self-noise. It is ideal for budget film or field production where you want to get the best sound for the money. It can be a good alternative to Sennheiser MKH 416 because it does almost exactly the same job at a lower price. This mic has RF-bias capsule, which is known as true condenser. This sets it up from entry shotguns (which are all back electret) and allows achieving even better sound while also giving the flexibility to work in humid conditions where other mics fail. The only downside – it requires phantom power to operate!

Sound & quality

Rode NTG3 is capable of producing a beautiful, natural sound where it’s really hard to find any flaws. It has a flat frequency response with just a little of added brightness that makes it sound a bit more expressive. Very similar to MKH 416, although Sennheiser is a tad brighter, but the sound quality is just about as good. What you will especially love about NTG3 is how it handles the highs – they are perfectly clean! It’s important, because most entry shotguns (e.g. NTG2) do introduce some degree of harshness to higher frequencies, which may be less noticeable though when comparing compressed audio files.

This mic also has a more impactful reproduction of dynamics and aside from dialogues it can handle more explosive sound effects. Another key feature of NTG3 is the low self-noise figure of only 13 dB (A-weighted) that is better than any entry level shotgun. Interestingly, MKH 416 is also rated 13 dB-A, and yet Rode has a slightly higher sensitivity figure (31 mV/Pa vs 25 mV/Pa). Of course, that is not the end of the line. There is, for instance, another bad-ass shotgun from Sennheiser – MKH60, which is significantly more quiet but is also twice more expensive than the NTG3…


The pickup pattern of NTG3 is wider than most entry shotguns, including the most popular MKE 600, NTG4, NTG2 and AT897. The wider pickup makes it a bit less forgiving when an actor goes off-axis and results in less hyped low end when up close due to proximity. On the other hand, it will also pick up a bit more of the background but for booming I’ll take it any time over the above mentioned mics – the cleaner sound of NTG3 is worth it. Sennheiser MKH 416 has even wider pattern, which also means less proximity, but by far it also has the poorest rejection than any other shotgun.

RF-bias capsule

ntg3-adAlthough both professional and entry-level shotguns generally use condenser capsules, it’s important to understand the distinction between back electret and RF-bias condensers. They are basically two methods of polarization that apply electrostatic charge to the diaphragm in order to make it sensitive enough for the mic to work. Back electret has some electrostatic material applied to the back of the capsule that gives it a permanent charge; RF-bias or true condenser capsule requires an electric current from the outside to become polarized, and this current is supplied through phantom power.

While having certain limitations, back electret shotguns can work on low voltage and they are quite power efficient. For example, NTG2 can work for a couple hundred hours from a single AA battery. On the other hand, true condensers and especially NTG3 are power greedy. Even though it’s possible to connect it directly to digital recorders like Zoom H4N that do supply phantom power – they will be drained very quickly – and the same applies for cameras, so don’t do this mistake! If you want a quick and simple solution for your digital recorder, please consider NTG4+ or MKH 600 instead.

Power options

If you don’t want to settle for entry shotguns and desire professional sound, here is how you can go about NTG3. You can use a field mixer: those devices fit up to 8 AA batteries and that’s enough to power this and other XLR mics for many hours. Mix if needed, then simply feed it to your recorder. Field mixers are handy for run and gun / ENG, though I wish NTG3 also had some low cut to apply for vocals straight away. Sound Devices produce professional mixers that have very good preamps and plenty of features. If you can afford one, you’ll probably get better results than if plugging to the digital recorder alone.

Among cheaper ones, there is Azden. They are basic but they get the job done without fuss. Particularly, I advise FMX-32, which fits 6 AA batteries and offers 3 channels, and should be enough for our purpose. Another option is to get Zoom F8. It is a solid recorder with 8 channels and 8 internal batteries, and it actually replaces the need for field mixer. It also has limiters where you can see immediately what’s going on but unlike mixer, it can record both the mix and individual channels too! If you don’t already own a decent recorder, then going straight for Zoom F8 can be an altogether better solution.


Humidity is another reason to choose NTG3 over the entry back-electret shotguns. The problem with back electret capsules is that they cannot stand elevated levels of humidity. If exposed, they will produce lots of pops and crackles, and that is a very ugly thing to hear. Since shotguns are mostly used outside, this can be a huge obstacle. You don’t need to put it under heavy rain to experience that; having some moisture in the air is all it takes. That can also be triggered when someone is really breathing or spitting into the mic. When indoors, you should also be vary of humidifiers.

Some places naturally have higher humidity, so take it into consideration as well. Countries with tropical climate or close to equator, especially South East, Central Africa and parts of Latin America are first in the list. Also, be cautious when going to safari or shooting documentaries. Early mornings outdoors, you may get condensate that is very bad for all of your equipment. Fortunately, moisture exposure has only temporary effects and when dried up, electret mics will work again. Yet, this will still hinder your production… meanwhile prolonged exposure of any microphone can cause permanent damage. Rode NTG3, on the other hand, like all professional shotguns has no issues with high humidity.

Build and setup

This mic measures 10” long and weighs 163 grams. It has a simple but durable design, no LEDs nor switches to be found. Like all Rode mics, it is covered by extendable 10 years warranty. The cool thing about NTG3 – it comes in a rugged waterproof aluminum case, which feels more like bulletproof… It includes standard foam that will protect it from light wind. If you want a bit more protection, you can get Rode WS7 but for professional mics, I usually recommend getting blimp right away. This will save you from disappointment when someday wind suddenly creeps into your recordings.

There are basically two options: Rode Blimp and Rycote Super Shield. Blimp is of course more common because it’s promoted by Rode, but it has two disadvantages. The carcass is made of questionable quality plastic that forms hexagons as you can see on the pictures. After good amount of use, it may start to develop cracks that don’t look appealing at all. Another disadvantage is weight: while super shield weighs only 2.1 pounds, blimp weighs 2.8 pounds and when holding it on a pole it actually feels heavier. Rycote shield is more expensive but it also has replaceable front and rear rod parts.


  • Professional quality
  • Beautiful, natural sound
  • Perfectly clean highs
  • Low noise, good sensitivity
  • Comes in a rugged waterproof case
  • Works in humid environments
  • Great value for money


  • Not the tightest pattern
  • Lacks low cut filter
Best Price on RØDE NTG3

WARNING! MAKE SURE YOUR AMAZON SELLER IS AUTHORIZED: https://rode.com/en/support/where-to-buy

Review score
  • Excellent! - 9.2/10


  • apkarian


    I want to know one thing, do you think that there is a sensible difference in audio between the NTG3 and the mke 600 for voice recording in short distance (not exceed 3/4m) ?

    Thank in advance

    • Peter

      Definitely yes – MKE 600 is considered an entry shotgun; NTG3 on the other hand is comparable to higher tier Sennheisers. To state the obvious, NTG3 is quieter in terms of noise and the audio is altogether cleaner. In typical circumstances, you may not necessarily hear an audible difference and can probably achieve good results with either. But if you want the best quality all the way, then it perfectly makes sense to use a professional mic – among which, NTG3 is actually on affordable side… the upper price range is around $2,000.

      • Giuseppe Valentino

        Dear Peter, thanks for your great reviews! I was looking to buy the Rode NTG-3 to have it work with the Zoom H5 portable recorder, then I stumbled in your review and I read about the power greedy aspect of the mike. I’m in doubt now. I’ve worked with two mikes, plugged at the same time in the recorder, both in need of phantom power and the Panasonic Eneloop batteries lasted for more then 2 hours of continuous recording, I thought it is a stellar performance. Will it be about the same amount of time with the NTG-3 or it will be crazy power hungry as mike, so much as to be unpractical? I’m a documentary filmmaker and I work basically sometimes with no sound-man and I need some good quality and good performance at the same time. Thanks for your time I really appreciate your help! Giuseppe

        • Peter

          Thanks :) Keep in mind, there is a huge difference in power consumption between externally polarized and electret condenser capsules. I for one doubt NTG3 would last more than 1 hour alone [ with your Zoom H5 recorder ]. Maybe in your case it’s better to go for the old MKH 416, which is more expensive but certainly lasts much longer.

          • Giuseppe Valentino

            Dear Peter, thanks for your answer. I had the chance to buy a used Rode Ntg-3 almost mint. I’m checking the battery consumption right now while I’m writing you and with standard rechargeable Amazon batteries I’m now hitting the two full hours of recording on a Zoom H5, phantom power of course on. What shall we conclude? For my kind of work (one man band documentary filmmaking) more then two hours are not bad at all. Let’s not forget that I’m using standard battery packs, not prosumer Eneloop which are known to last longer. Plus, with the Zoom H5 we can use an external power bank, tiny devices in terms of space nowadays. Anyway Peter, thanks a lot for your help, maybe we could expand your review with this new piece of information and help people to better choose, the NTG-3 is a great mike, I’m listening now the improvement of sound, handling noise etc. So is a great step-up in terms of quality. Thanks again and keep up the good work. Giuseppe

  • Just bought my second one. fantastic microphone indeed!

  • Jackie Minor

    Hi Peter,
    Reading through all of this is very helpful. I’m trying to source professional grade ambient mics for corporate event spaces. The issue is that in at least one of the rooms, the mics get mounted 20 ft or so in the air. We have a significant HVAC issue in that room, which is why we’re looking to shotgun mics to provide better ambient response. Do you think the NTG3 would be suitable for that purpose?

    • Peter

      Although there is no ideal solution to this yes, using a directional mic would help a ton. If you are in a spacious room it wouldn’t hurt using a shotgun unless your are close to a ceiling, because of exposure to reflections from the rear. However, with longer distance shotguns also introduce a bit of comb-filtering, so I would rather use Audix SCX1-HC. But if high-pitched noise is the problem, then actually go for NTG3 – specific to your case, it will be a good compromise. The use of shock mount is not obvious for stationary mics, but if you are dealing with strong vibrations they could reduce the rumble noise.

Leave a Reply to apkarian Cancel reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>