<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sennheiser MKH 8050 / MKH 50 &#8211; supercardioid indoor microphone</title>
	<atom:link href="https://microphonegeeks.com/sennheiser-mkh-50-supercardioid-indoor-microphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://microphonegeeks.com/sennheiser-mkh-50-supercardioid-indoor-microphone/</link>
	<description>Best Microphone Review Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 01:48:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>https://microphonegeeks.com/sennheiser-mkh-50-supercardioid-indoor-microphone/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2024 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microphonegeeks.com/?p=2288#comment-963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#039;s mainly the form factor—the 8050 is &lt;em&gt;much &lt;/em&gt;smaller, and being a newer version, I would expect somewhat higher reliability. Mkh 50 has slightly superior specs but feels more like a compact shotgun. If you mainly use it for booming just get the MKH 50, otherwise you may consider 8050 with its tiny footprint. Both options are fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s mainly the form factor—the 8050 is <em>much </em>smaller, and being a newer version, I would expect somewhat higher reliability. Mkh 50 has slightly superior specs but feels more like a compact shotgun. If you mainly use it for booming just get the MKH 50, otherwise you may consider 8050 with its tiny footprint. Both options are fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>https://microphonegeeks.com/sennheiser-mkh-50-supercardioid-indoor-microphone/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johnny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 16:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microphonegeeks.com/?p=2288#comment-962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m looking for a high-quality supercardioid mic. Could you clarify the difference between the two?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking for a high-quality supercardioid mic. Could you clarify the difference between the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>https://microphonegeeks.com/sennheiser-mkh-50-supercardioid-indoor-microphone/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://microphonegeeks.com/?p=2288#comment-961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I absolutely swear by this mic, both the new and the old versions seem out of reach for most people&#039;s budgets. If you&#039;re looking for an indoor alternative, consider the &lt;a href=&quot;https://microphonegeeks.com/audix-scx1-hc-indoor-hypercardioid-review/&quot; title=&quot;Audix SCX1-HC – indoor hypercardioid review&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Audix SCX1-HC review&lt;/a&gt; — it delivers excellent performance at a much more affordable price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I absolutely swear by this mic, both the new and the old versions seem out of reach for most people&#8217;s budgets. If you&#8217;re looking for an indoor alternative, consider the <a href="https://microphonegeeks.com/audix-scx1-hc-indoor-hypercardioid-review/" title="Audix SCX1-HC – indoor hypercardioid review" rel="nofollow">Audix SCX1-HC review</a> — it delivers excellent performance at a much more affordable price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.033 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2026-04-06 14:51:18 -->

<!-- Compression = gzip -->